Wednesday, 28 May 2008

A Real Stateman


Lebanon is blessed to have Prime Minister Saniora back...Please read…
Report as Inappropriate


Lebanon is blessed to have Prime Minister Saniora lead the highest executive job in the land.

The whole decent International community is blessed with the continuous presence of Prime Minister Saniora allover the political and diplomatic scenes.

I agree with Edward in New York that all what Aoun accomplished was his prediction that Prime Minister Saniora will not have time to PACK AND GO! Justice prevailed and now it is Aoun who became the looser upon leaving the M14 Camp and today we all witness the following:
1- The persistence of Prime Minister Saniora until the last moment leading to the election of President Michel Suleiman.
2- The uninterrupted continuity of Prime Minister Saniora in leading the highest executive job in the land…Hallelujah!

I agree with Tabasco in Lebanon and Julia in Canada that Prime Minister Saniora is a real true Lebanese and a real STATESMAN.

I agree with Georges in Paris, France, Lebanese in Lebanon, developed Lebanon in Beirut, and Lucas in Bekaa, that Prime Minister Saniora is the BEST man for the job.

I agree with Shab, for a new Lebanon, that Prime Minister Saniora is a true HONORABLE STATESMAN who puts Lebanon first.

I agree with Nader in Beirut that Prime Minister Saniora is the best PM and a great Statesman.

I agree with Incognito that God is with Lebanon as manifested through the continuous presence of the BEST Prime Minister Lebanon has ever had.

I agree with Karim Dada in Istanbul, Long live Prime Minister Saniora, Long live President Bush, Long live Israel, Long live Saudi Arabia…and yes for the great nation of Lebanon under the leadership of Prime Minister Saniora…and yes for a special International College to teach the art of governing Saniora style.

However, I totally disagree with Karim Dada about the racial slurs, disgraces, and insult against our national citizens the Armenians and the Christians in general. Yes the Armenians voted against Ex-President Gemayel despite the murder of his son Deputy and Minister Pierre but we still need to embrace them as any other community in Lebanon and their make up in our diversification is the secret in making our Lebanon unique.

Furthermore, it is not right to label any individual who does not share with you the same faith as infidel. Karim Dada needs to learn a lot about love and tolerance. I recommend for Karim Dada to Google the word fitna and watch the Dutch movie.

I agree with Mustapha o. ghalayini, about the successful results in winning a new President for Lebanon, winning Prime Minister Saniora back for a long time, dismantling the tents Camp Downtown, the moukawama being transformed into a sectarian gang, and finally the end of orangina...

I agree with Dania. Thanks God Prime Minister Saniora is back! And for sure Aoun (GMA) will neverrrrrr everrrrrr ever be President. I concur le Phénicien just had an aneurysm!

I enjoyed the hilarious comment of Fuziyad: Prime Minister Saniora stretched a hand, extended his middle finger and said: Khod ya Nasrallah!

I am not a politician and I don’t know all the inside information that Prime Minister Saniora has. However, I would hope to see Prime Minister Saniora establishes full and final peace with Israel. This will bring the end to Hizballah and enough is enough. Is President Bashar Assad of Syria better than us in attempting Peace with Israel? Are Egypt, Jordan, and Qatar better than Lebanon in acting smart and establishing Peace with Israel? On several occasions President Bush saw in Prime Minister Saniora a better partner for Peace with Prime Minister Olmert.

I hope Prime Minister Saniora will not repeat the same old statement that Lebanon will be the last to sign a Peace deal and as he retracted on his decisions concerning the spying wires of Hizballah and their affiliate Head at the Airport’s security, he will change his views about Israel, stretches his hands to Israel and then flexes and extends his middle fingers to Syria and Iran!

Friday, 23 May 2008

LEBANON: Druze Take On Hezbollah, Because They Must


BEIRUT, May 21 (IPS) - Ghostly white sculptures are scattered along the greenery on each side of a sinuous road leading up to a Lebanese mountain range, their silhouettes contrasting against the violet sky. This area, known as the Symposium in Aley, Mount Lebanon, is located behind the infamous '888' mountaintop, a strategic point in Lebanese military history.

Recently, it was once again the scene of bloody combats, with Druze fighters battling Hezbollah militants. Old memories of war have been suddenly conjured up among the Druze -- one of Lebanon's smallest religious sects -- fuelling sectarian sentiment.

A cohesive, close-knit community, the Lebanese Druze, also known as al-Mowahedoon (Unitarians), are comprised of some 250,000 people spread across Mount Lebanon, the Chouf area, Bekaa valley and South Lebanon. "The movement -- which was initiated by Hamzah Bin Ali and originally split in 1017 from Ismail Shiism -- is built on an esoteric interpretation of Islam and Sufism. Druze people were also warriors that historically defended the Muslim abode," explains Dr. Sami Makarem, professor at the American University of Beirut and author of 'The Druze Faith'.

Over the past three years, since the assassination of former prime minister Rafik Hariri, allegedly at the hands of Syria, the country has been divided between a pro-Western majority (the March 14 Movement) and a pro-Syrian and Iranian opposition. Comprising the March 14 majority is the Sunni Future Movement, the Christian Lebanese Forces and Kataeb party and the Druze Progressive Socialist Party (PSP) -- which boasts of the majority of Druze supporters and is led by Walid Joumblat, who also heads one of the most prominent Druze feudal families.

On the opposing side is Prince Talal Arslan, head of the Druze Democratic Party, which is allied with Shia opposition groups Hezbollah and Amal as well as the Christian Free Patriotic Movement.

Discord among the warring factions took a turn for the worse on May 7, when a scheduled labour protest morphed into a semi-coup. Over the course of seven days, brutal battles were unleashed in several Druze mountain villages between Druze fighters and Hezbollah militants after the 'Party of God' took over Beirut within hours on May 8. According to Wajdi Mrad, Aley's mayor, tensions initially started to rise as reports of Hezbollah vans driving around the '888' mountaintop and roadblocks being erected by militants circulated in the region.

In a fragmented country like Lebanon, villages, towns and regions have been historically tinted with sectarian colours, as most are inhabited by one dominant community or another, with the exception of Beirut, which is a melting pot of different sects. Any attempt to invade a particular territory is treated as a direct threat to the community. Thus, Hezbollah's infiltration into Aley's 888 Mountain on May 8 was seen as an attack on the Druze inhabitants in the area, and led to the killing of three of the militant group's fighters, whose bodies were later paraded in town by Druze militia men.

The next day, four Druze members of the Aley municipal police were kidnapped by Hezbollah in retaliation, which led to a wave of violence in the mountain region in the Druze villages of Aley, Bayssour, Aytat and Choueifat, and the surrounding of the two Shia villages of Keyfoun and Qmatieyh. Violence spread to the Druze strongholds of Barouk and Niha in the Chouf, where attempted Hezbollah operations were aborted by Druze fighters and dozens of the party's gunmen were arrested and remanded to the Lebanese army.

"The events that took place in the mountains initially resulted from the killing of the three Hezbollah members and were politically motivated without any confessional dimensions," says lawyer Malek Arslan, member of Arslan's Democratic Party. The death toll in the battles remains much disputed on both sides of the divide: according to the PSP, some 19 Druze and 40 Hezbollah fighters were killed during the conflict, while a Hezbollah source would only confirm the death of 11 of its militants.

Little is known of Hezbollah's true intentions in the mountains, and theories about the party's motivation remain controversial. One explanation stems from the geographical location of the two Shia enclaves of Qmatieh and Qayfoun within the dominant Druze area. The seizure of Choueifat would have allowed Hezbollah to connect the two villages to their stronghold in Dahyeh, in the suburbs of Beirut. The incentive to converge Shia areas could account for the party's use of excessive force, including the bombing of Choueifat using heavy weapons like 106mm and 23mm rockets.

Many in the Druze community, however, remain doubtful as to the reasons behind Hezbollah's attack on their villages.

"What motivated Hezbollah to send fighters into the region? I am absolutely sure they were not from -- with the exception of one -- Keyfoun or Qmatieh, but from the South," says Mrad, who was injured in the battle that took place on the '888' mountain. The mayor explains that he was visited by a delegation from Keyfoun, who came to inquire about his health and assure him that no feud would take place between the village residents and the Druze.

When gunfire erupted on the fronts of the '888' mountain and Bayssour, Druze villagers sprang to defend their territory, taking their 15-year-old Kalashnikovs from the civil war days (which lasted from 1975-1990) and hunting rifles. "The Druze is the son of his land, which bears significant meaning to him. There is a trinity in the Druze belief between the soul, the body and the land," said Makarem.

Every Druze house has weapons, says one Druze doctor who resides in the area and joined the new security apparatus that has been recently put in place in the mountain villages. "The PSP may still possess old weapons caches from the 1980s, but most villagers automatically seized any weapons they could get their hands on, whether a knife, rifle or gun as they heard the sounds of shooting and bombing resonating in the valley," he recalls.

The physician, who participated in the 1975 war when he was just 14, never expected to revert once again to the language of weapons. "We were under attack and reacted accordingly. Our priority is to defend our homes, our land and our families. It is a matter of honour for us. What is life worth living if I am subjected to the killing of my family, or humiliation?" he asks.

According to Makarem, the Druze belief is built on three aspects of existence, each complemented by four essential qualities. "The mind is dovetailed by wisdom, the heart by courage, and the body by moderation. The fourth quality linking the other three together is the accomplishment of justice."

In the streets of Choueifat, justice and honour seem to be closely intertwined in the Druze collective unconscious. "Hezbollah staged a coordinated attack on our village. My neighbours, who I have lived with for more than 20 years and who belong to Hezbollah, left two days before the attack. Militia men stormed the village, putting guns to our heads, destroying religious and political symbols," says a mother of three, who supports Arslan's opposition Democratic Party.

"I used to support the resistance against Israel and Hezbollah's defence of its weapons. But, here in Choueifat, fighters from the Party of God treated us as if we were Israelis, regardless of whether or not we belonged to the PSP or their allies, the Democratic Party," she adds, clearly shaken.

A few steps away, in the Old Souk area, which witnessed the brunt of the battle, a young girl, May Tarrabay, told IPS: "I am extremely distraught at the turn of events. I will face difficulties in trusting Hezbollah once again, or any member of the Shia community. It is sad that it has come to this."

In Druze areas, the political divide among the population seems to have faded away. "For the Druze, political dissensions vanish when the community is under attack," says Makarem. "This can be attributed to our minority position and to our Unitarian beliefs." (END/2008)

Thursday, 22 May 2008

"Le Malheure du Liban c est que la Syrie, le considere comme une Province"



_____________________________________________________________________________________

de notre envoyé spécial à Beyrouth Patrick Forestier

Kalachnikov en bandoulière, les gardes du corps placent deux Mercedes blindées en position de départ. Dehors, la poitrine couverte de chargeurs, les fidèles de Walid Joumblatt scrutent la rue barrée par des blocs de béton et des blindés. Depuis l’arrêt des combats, c’est la première fois que le leader druze sort de son domicile de Beyrouth, quartier Clemenceau. Une incursion rarissime car il reste, avec Saad Hariri, le chef de la majorité antisyrienne, l’homme le plus menacé du Liban. Joumblatt est celui qui a déclenché les dernières hostilités... en dénonçant l’existence d’un réseau téléphonique clandestin, installé par le Hezbollah, dans les trois quarts du pays, et la présence d’une caméra à l’aéroport. Pour faire annuler la suspension par le gouvernement du général chiite qui commande la sécurité de l’aéroport, les miliciens du Hezbollah ont investi Beyrouth-Ouest, la musulmane, peuplée en majorité de sunnites. Une opération éclair qui a surpris Walid Joumblatt, comme la plupart des opposants à la Syrie. «Les armes crépitaient dans les rues, raconte Nora, l’épouse de Walid. Mais nous n’avons pas abandonné la capitale. Se réfugier dans la montagne aurait été une fuite.»
Arrive Walid, avec la mine des mauvais jours. Le chef du Parti socialiste progressiste (PSP) a traversé trente ans de guerre, mais ces derniers combats semblent l’avoir marqué. «C’est un coup d’Etat déguisé», lâche-t-il, en m’invitant à monter dans une Mercedes noire, dont il prend le volant. Glissée entre son siège et le boîtier de vitesses automatique, une kalachnikov à crosse repliable, prête à être saisie de sa main droite. Refermer la portière épaisse comme celle d’un coffre-fort demande un gros effort. Une protection indispensable quand on est l’homme à abattre. A l’arrière, un garde du corps, un pistolet-mitrailleur sur les genoux. De l’extérieur, impossible de voir les passagers et donc de savoir où se trouve Walid Joumblatt. Walid conduit lentement, comme si la menace était inexistante. Son propre père a pourtant été assassiné et Rafic Hariri, son allié antisyrien, victime d’un attentat. Depuis, une vingtaine d’autres personnalités ont été tuées. Walid Joumblatt reste en tête de liste, sans perdre son franc-parler. «A Beyrouth, je me sens davantage menacé, me dit-il. Le Hezbollah contrôle tout. Si j’évite de sortir, c’est aussi pour éviter qu’un attentat contre moi coûte la vie à des concitoyens», poursuit-il en empruntant l'autoroute du sud, prise en tenaille entre les pistes de l'aéroport et des quartiers chiites, fief du Hezbollah, où se cache leur chef Hassan Nasrallah.
«LE BUT DU HEZBOLLAH?
AFFAIBLIR LE GOUVERNEMENT
LIBANAIS»
Je lui demande pourquoi il a parlé du réseau téléphonique et des caméras de surveillance du Hezbollah : « Parce que ce parti a bâti un Etat dans l’Etat et travaille pour l’Iran, qui vient de marquer un point supplémentaire au Liban. Leur réseau téléphonique a été déployé au détriment de celui de l’Etat, qui, après la TVA, demeure sa principale recette. Selon le Hezbollah, ce réseau protège ses cadres. En fait, des milliers de lignes s’étalent, depuis Beyrouth jusqu’au Sud, à la frontière israélienne, mais aussi au Nord, et se poursuivent jusqu’en Syrie, où le Hezbollah trouve ses soutiens. Quant à la caméra installée sur le parking réservé aux avions privés, elle serait une mesure de sécurité ! Jusqu’à présent, Saad Hariri et moi, lorsque nous devions aller à l’étranger, nous partions de nuit, à l’improviste, dans un jet garé à l’écart. Il faudra désormais demander au Hezbollah une permission et une escorte. Quand le gouvernement a voulu faire cesser ces pratiques, les miliciens du Hezbollah ont attaqué. Ils avaient affirmé que leurs armes n’étaient tournées que vers Israël. Mais ils ont prouvé qu’ils voulaient conserver leurs prérogatives. Quitte à tirer sur des Libanais. M. Nasrallah a même déclaré qu’il possédait des armes pour défendre ses armes ! Avec ces nouveaux cercles concentriques, on n'en finit plus. En 2000, lorsque l'armée israélienne s'est retirée du Sud, le Hezbollah n'a pas voulu désarmer. Il a sorti comme prétexte les fameuses fermes de Cheba'a [quelques arpents de terre qui appartiendraient à la Syrie]. Durant l'été 2006, ils ont procédé à un coup de main contre une patrouille israélienne, fait des prisonniers, et on a eu la guerre pendant deux mois. Il affirme détenir encore plus de missiles pour attaquer Israël à nouveau, sans se préoccuper de l’opinion des Libanais et du gouvernement. Cette affaire de téléphone et de caméra n’était qu’un prétexte. Leur but ? Affaiblir le gouvernement. Ils y ont réussi avec ce coup de force.»
«CHRETIENS ET DRUZES
SONT DEVENUS MINORITAIRES»
Malgré les risques, le chef druze tient à sa tournée dans son fief du Chouf, qui a résisté aux attaques du Hezbollah, avant d’embarquer dans l’avion qui emmène tous les protagonistes à la réunion de la dernière chance à Doha, sous l’égide du Qatar. Il veut s’arrêter à Khaldé, un village du bord de mer où réside Talal Arslane, un leader druze, allié du Hezbollah et proche de la Syrie. Face à la menace de guerre civile, Arslane a mis de côté sa rivalité avec Joumblatt. «Il m’a téléphoné pendant les combats, pour savoir si j’avais besoin d’aide. Il est normal que je lui rende visite», me dit Joumblatt. En fin politique qui protège sa communauté, «Walid Bey» est venu calmer le jeu. «Le recours aux armes est sans issue, dit-il aux Druzes de l’autre bord. Le pays a traversé une crise grave. Il reste à remettre en avant notre coexistence avec la communauté chiite de la montagne.»
Nous reprenons la route. Direction Choueifate, village druze noyé au milieu d’une population chiite. «Ce sont des HLM fortifiées. Ils tirent depuis ces immeubles», confie Joumblatt. Ici, les combats ont été violents : une quinzaine de morts et une vingtaine de blessés. Les Druzes ont été attaqués à l’arme lourde. La maison de Haytham al-Jurdi, le maire, n’a pas été épargnée. Il nous attend au milieu des gravats. La bâtisse a reçu plusieurs roquettes. Autour, les villageois attendent le chef. Vêtus du sarouel, le pantalon bouffant noir, et coiffés de la calotte blanche traditionnelle, les cheiks sont venus saluer Walid Bey. Là aussi, il essaye de calmer les esprits avec des phrases d'apaisement : «Le meilleur moyen de se défendre est le dialogue et la coexistence avec les villages voisins.» Sous-entendu, avec ceux où vivent les chiites, qui construisent toujours plus, dans une région druze. «L’Iran finance, et leurs familles comptent de nombreux enfants, me souffle Walid. Monogames et citadins, les couples druzes n’ont plus que deux enfants en moyenne. Avec les chrétiens, nous sommes de plus en plus minoritaires. Nous avions combattu avec les chiites pendant l’invasion israélienne. Mais le fanatisme engendre la situation actuelle.»

_____________________________________________________________


le leader druze est venu rendre visite à des cheiks
de sa communauté dans le Chouf.

_____________________________________________________________

Nous abandonnons la Mercedes blindée pour un Range Rover. Le contraire serait mal compris. Dans sa montagne, Walid est en sécurité. Même si un attentat est toujours possible. Il conduit vitre baissée, saluant de la main les gens massés au bord de la route, qui lui jettent des poignées de grains de riz, censés porter bonheur. A chaque arrêt, la foule entoure sa voiture, sous les applaudissements et les youyous des femmes : «Ils me demandent armes et munitions, précise Joumblatt. Ce serait une erreur : notre puissance de feu sera toujours inférieure à celle du Hezbollah. Face à une attaque massive, nous ne tiendrions qu’une semaine. Leur coup de force voulait démontrer que nous sommes à leur merci. Il faut accepter le fait accompli, en cohabitant avec l’Etat Hezbollah, tout en conservant un minimum d’indépendance. L’axe irano-syrien a réussi à implanter au Liban une force censée prendre en étau Israël, avec le Hamas à Gaza, poursuit-il. Depuis qu’Ahmadinejad et ses pasdarans sont au pouvoir à Téhéran, le Hezbollah s’affirme comme leur tête de pont sur cette rive de la Méditerranée. Dans des semi-remorques arrivés de Syrie – transportant officiellement des marchandises –, ils dissimulent des fusées en pièces détachées, capables d’atteindre Jérusalem. Le Hezbollah dispose de rampes de lancement mobiles, cachées dans les quartiers sud de Beyrouth. Personne ne contrôle la frontière avec la Syrie, ajoute-t-il. Les routes militaires sont interdites au public. Il existerait même des souterrains entre les deux pays.»

A Baïssour, nous rejoignons Ghazi Aridi, le ministre de l’Information, resté bloqué dans sa maison plus de deux heures, sous les tirs de miliciens chiites embusqués dans Leyfoun, une ville peuplée de 30 000 habitants qui domine le village druze. Des combats ont éclaté, mais les combattants druzes n’ont pas failli à leur réputation de guerriers. Et ont décimé un convoi d’une trentaine de véhicules du Hezbollah. Côté chiite, il y aurait eu une cinquantaine de victimes. Certaines auraient eu les mains tranchées... Aujourd’hui, Walid ne veut voir que l’avenir, plutôt sombre : le Liban est au bord de la guerre civile. Même si le Hezbollah lâche du lest à la réunion de Doha, il ne transigera pas sur son désarmement. D’où le souhait des autres communautés de s’armer. Plus personne ne croit que le Hezbollah ne tournera pas une nouvelle fois ses fusils contre la population, y compris contre ses frères musulmans.
A Aley, Joumblatt est accueilli avec des cris de joie: «Walid Bey, avec notre sang, avec notre cœur!», scande la foule. Dans la mairie, le leader druze tente une nouvelle fois de calmer les esprits. «J'insiste sur le fait que l'armée et les forces de l'ordre sont notre unique protection. Nous espérons un jour, que seul l'Etat aura le monopole des armes.» Sur le chemin du retour à Beyrouth, Walid se confie : «Le malheur du Liban, c’est que la Syrie le considère comme sa province, tandis que l’Iran y a développé une force qui lui est acquise.» Dans la capitale, diplomates et spécialistes le savent : la pléthorique ambassade d’Iran «conseille» de très près le Hezbollah. Pour les sunnites, c’est inadmissible. L’antagonisme sunnisme-chiisme, incarné par l’Arabie saoudite et l’Iran, se traduit au Liban par la plus forte crise depuis la guerre civile. Dans son palais de Koraytem, où Saad Hariri vit reclus, l’ambiance est mortifère.
L’IRAN CONTINUERA DE DICTER
SES ORDRES
Le fils du Premier ministre assassiné n’a pas voulu engager de combat contre le Hezbollah, refusant la responsabilité de déclencher une nouvelle guerre, et ne disposant pas de miliciens aguerris. Le calcul politique était risqué, mais partiellement réussi. En attaquant Beyrouth et non Israël, les « résistants » autoproclamés du Hezbollah ont tombé le masque : pour la majorité des Libanais, leur but consiste à contrôler le gouvernement. «Pour nous, Doha, c’est Munich en 1938, quand Paris et Londres ont signé la paix avec Hitler, me confie un négociateur sunnite. Le Hezbollah ne lâchera pas ses armes. L’Iran continuera de dicter ses ordres au gouvernement. Des fusées à longue portée pourraient être déployées au Liban et menacer les côtes européennes si, par exemple, le bras de fer avec Téhéran se poursuit à propos du nucléaire. Quant aux sunnites libanais, qui accusent leurs chefs de ne pas les avoir protégés des chiites, ils pourraient être attirés par les extrémistes, et ouvrir leurs bras à Al-Qaïda. Déjà, à Tripoli, des cheiks salafistes appellent à la guerre contre les chiites, comme en Irak. Un chaos alors inévitable et menaçant pour l’Europe aussi.» «Stopper cet engrenage est très difficile, soupire Walid Joumblatt. Les intellectuels chiites en désaccord avec le Hezbollah ne peuvent rien dire : ils sont impuissants devant le fanatisme religieux et M. Nasrallah, qui se croit infaillible», dit-il, en levant les yeux au ciel.

The Doha Agreement


The closing session of the Lebanese Dialogue Conference in Doha, Qatar, was held at 10:30 AM on May 21, 2008. During this session, Qatari PM and Foreign Minister Hamad bin Jassem read the following address:

Your Highness Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, Emir of the State of Qatar,
Honorable Lebanese brothers,

With the Grace of God and thanks to the cooperation of our Lebanese brothers and the efforts made by the Arab League’s secretary-general and their Excellencies the members of the Ministerial Committee, an agreement was reached based on a consensus and understanding among our Lebanese brothers. Dear brothers, your wisdom and cooperation with me and the members of the committee played an essential role in concluding this agreement, which we hope, first and foremost, will be implemented immediately in order to preserve Lebanon’s security and stability and secure its people’s progress and welfare.

It is a pleasure for me to read out the text of the agreement that was reached this morning by the participants in the National Dialogue Conference in Doha:

“The Doha Agreement ‘on the results of the Lebanese National Dialogue Conference’

Under the honorable aegis of His Highness Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani of Qatar, and pursuant to the efforts made by the Arab Ministerial Committee to resolve the Lebanese crisis under the guidance of Qatari PM and Foreign Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassem bin Jar al-Thani, Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa and their Excellencies the foreign ministers of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, the Kingdom of Bahrain, the Democratic Popular Republic of Algeria, the Republic of Djibouti, the Sultanate of Oman, the Moroccan Kingdom and the Republic of Yemen,

Based on the Arab initiative regarding containment of the Lebanese crisis, and in pursuance of the agreement concluded among the Lebanese parties in Beirut on May 15, 2008, under the aegis of the Arab Ministerial Committee, which is an integral part of this Declaration (enclosed),

The Lebanese National Dialogue Conference was held in Doha between May 16 and May 21, 2008, with the participation of the Lebanese political leaders who are members of the National Dialogue Conference and who have asserted their commitment to saving Lebanon and ending the current political crisis and its dangerous consequences for the coexistence formula and civil peace among the Lebanese, as well as their commitment to the principles enshrined by the Lebanese constitution and the Taif Accord; and as a result of this Conference, as well as of the bilateral and collective meetings and consultations between the president and members of the Arab Ministerial Committee and all parties that took part in this Conference,

The following agreement was reached:

First: The parties have agreed on having the Lebanese parliament speaker, based on the rules in effect, invite the parliament to convene within 24 hours to elect consensus candidate General Michel Sleiman, knowing that this is the best constitutional method to elect the president under these exceptional circumstances.

Second: forming a national unity government composed of 30 ministers distributed among the majority (16 ministers), the opposition (11 ministers) and the president (3 ministers), and by virtue of this agreement, all parties commit not to resign or obstruct the government’s actions.

Third: adopting the caza as an electoral constituency in conformity with the 1960 law, whereby the cazas of Marjayoun-Hasbaya, Baalbek-Hermel and West Bekaa-Rachaya remain as a single electoral constituency each.

As for Beirut, it was divided in the following manner:

The first district: Achrafieh – Rmeil – Saifi
The second district: Bachoura – Medawar – the Port
The third district: Minet al-Hosn – Ain al-Mreisseh – Al-Mazraa – Mousseitbeh – Ras Beirut – Zoqaq al-Blat

Agreeing on referring the reform clauses mentioned in the draft law prepared by the National Commission on Electoral Law Reform, which was headed by Minister Fouad Boutros, to the parliament in order to examine and discuss them in accordance with the rules in effect.

Fourth: Pursuant to the abovementioned Beirut Agreement, especially Paragraphs 4 and 5, which stated the following:

Paragraph 4: The parties commit to abstain from having recourse or resuming the use of weapons and violence in order to record political gains.

Paragraph 5: Initiate a dialogue on promoting the Lebanese state’s authority over all Lebanese territory and their relationship with the various groups on the Lebanese stage in order to ensure the state’s and the citizens’ security.

Hence, the dialogue was initiated in Doha on promoting the state’s authority according to Paragraph 5 of the Beirut Agreement, and an agreement was reached on the following:

- Prohibiting the use of weapons or violence or taking refuge in them in any dispute whatsoever and under any circumstances, in order to ensure respect for the national partnership contract, based on the Lebanese people’s commitment to live with one another within the framework of the Lebanese system, and to restrict the security and military authority over Lebanese nationals and residents to the state alone so as to ensure the continuity of the coexistence formula and civil peace among all the Lebanese; and the parties pledge to all of the above.

- Implementing the law and upholding the sovereignty of the state throughout Lebanon so as not to have regions that serve as safe havens for outlaws, out of respect for the supremacy of the law, and referring all those who commit crimes and contraventions to the Lebanese judiciary.

This dialogue is to be resumed under the aegis of the president as soon as he is elected and a national unity government is formed, and with the participation of the Arab League in such a way as to boost confidence among the Lebanese.




Fifth: Reasserting the commitment of the Lebanese political leaders to immediately abstain from resorting to the rhetoric of treason or political or sectarian instigation.

The Arab Ministerial Committee undertakes to register this agreement before the Arab League General Secretariat as soon as it is signed.

This agreement was signed in Doha on May 21, 2008 by the Lebanese political leaders participating in the Conference and in the presence of the president and members of the Arab Ministerial Committee.”

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

Nous répondrons aux armes par les armes », affirment les habitants du Chouf


À défaut d’assurances solides et d’un accord politique de base
«
L'article de May MAKAREM


Enchâssé dans un cadre magnifique de montagnes et de forêts où la nature affiche toute son exubérance et où les genêts, comme des milliers d’étincelles, fusent en gerbes dorées, le Chouf semble enrobé dans une atmosphère de paix et de tranquillité. Impression trompeuse. « Tant que le Hezbollah a ses armes, la situation sera dangereuse. Nous restons vigilants et gardons l’œil ouvert », disent les habitants, se remémorant cette nuit de dimanche à lundi (la nuit du 11 mai), lorsque leurs regards étaient tournés vers Aley et Choueifate avant que la chaîne al-Manar n’annonce la « chute » de plusieurs villages du Chouf « entre les mains des moujahidine du Hezbollah ». L’information frappe comme un coup de fouet. C’est d’abord le choc ; quelques minutes de silence. Le désenchantement. Mais vite, très vite, l’âme druze s’enflamme. Cela a un nom, et cela autorise tous les espoirs, centuple tous les sursauts. Cela s’appelle la fibre druze. « Tout comme nous, les partisans du Parti démocrate de Talal Arslane se sont mobilisés pour défendre leurs maisons et leurs familles, l’unité et la dignité de la région », ajoutent-ils.
Aujourd’hui, la stupeur laisse la place à la colère et le même cri retentit : « Nous demandons des assurances solides et une solution politique. C’est la seule garantie contre les abus et les conflits. À défaut, aux armes, nous répondrons par des armes. Nous refusons d’être persécutés. »
Le 11 mai au soir, dans de nombreuses localités, les portes étaient restées ouvertes et les téléphones sonnaient dans le vide. Hommes, femmes et enfants, armés de kalachnikovs, de fusil de chasse, de couteaux ou de bêches, se sont déployés dans les rues. Les uns se postant à l’entrée des villages et à l’orée des bois « pour contrer toute tentative d’attaque », les autres convergeant vers Moukhtara, où plusieurs centaines de villageois s’étaient rassemblés devant le palais du leader druze, Walid Joumblatt. Ils réclamaient aux gardes de Joumblatt des munitions, hurlant qu’il y avait « la sécurité du Chouf à assurer » et « l’honneur à préserver », racontent un membre du conseil municipal et plusieurs témoins.
« La détermination était à son paroxysme. C’était impressionnant, mais pas particulièrement confortable car la tension montait d’un cran à chaque fois que je disais que je n’avais pas d’armes à distribuer. Ils ont dû se faire violence pour surmonter leur colère. Finalement, ils se sont dispersés pour rentrer chez eux et monter la garde autour de leurs quartiers », indique un responsable proche du leader druze.
Entre-temps, « des combattants issus de différents villages du Chouf étaient arrivés sur la ligne du front (les hauteurs du Chouf) et menaient une bataille féroce pour bloquer l’avancée du Hezbollah ». Ils étaient épaulés par une brigade de cheikhs druzes en « chéroual » kaki, coiffés d’une « alloussi » blanche, le front cerné d’un mouchoir. Ils arrivaient de partout en « psalmodiant des cantiques religieux qui, dans la nuit, résonnaient comme une menace. C’était surréaliste », indique une des personnes qui ont participé au combat à Mresti. Elle raconte que les habitants se sont retrouvés confrontés « à plus de 130 miliciens du parti de Dieu, armés de canons de mortier de 82 millimètres, de RPG, de mitrailleuses lourdes et de DCA 500 ». Selon ce témoin, les miliciens du Hezbollah, qui étaient à bord de 33 Cherokee, sont arrivés dans la zone qui s’étend entre le Barouk, au nord, et Toumat Niha, à l’ouest, en passant par Maasser, Mresti et les différentes zones surplombant le Chouf et Jezzine. « Ils avaient emprunté une route sablonneuse aménagée en 1982 par l’armée israélienne, reliant le Chouf à la Békaa, et ont ouvert les hostilités en bombardant des postes émetteurs appartenant à la LBCI et à Télé-Liban. Les affrontements ont duré plus de trois heures, faisant une vingtaine de morts et de blessés parmi les miliciens, et trois blessés dans les rangs des habitants. »
La nuit du 11 mai restera une date ancrée dans la mémoire de ce petit de 12 ans qui, muni d’un fusil de chasse, a accompagné son père dans la cédraie du Barouk. Encore ahuri par son aventure, cillant des paupières comme s’il venait de se réveiller, il raconte qu’il a voulu « donner un coup de main »... ou de gâchette. Sa maman implore « Dieu Tout-Puissant de ne plus revivre les heures d’angoisse » passées à attendre le retour de ses deux hommes. Un de leurs voisins n’est jamais rentré chez lui. « Âgé de 20 ans, il vient de succomber à ses blessures après plusieurs jours de coma », indique le directeur de l’hôpital Aïn-Zein, Dr al-Imad, signalant aussi que des « balles phosphorescentes » ont été utilisées au cours des affrontements.

May MAKAREM

Affaire Hariri - Le procès ne commencera pas avant la mi-2010

Un retour de l’opposition au gouvernement risquerait-il de compromettre l’établissement du tribunal ?
L'article de Tilda ABOU RIZK





Il y a fort à parier qu’avec un accord sur le gouvernement et le retour des ministres chiites au cabinet, qu’ils aient ou non la minorité de blocage avec leurs alliés, l’opposition contestera en premier la légalité des résolutions du gouvernement Siniora, dont bien entendu celles qui se rapportent à l’établissement du Tribunal spécial pour le Liban (TSL) qui doit juger les assassins de l’ancien Premier ministre, Rafic Hariri, et de 22 autres personnes tuées dans l’attentat du 14 février 2005. Pour la majorité, il est incontestable que la crise politique et ses ramifications ultérieures s’articulent autour de l’affaire du tribunal. Le député Samir Frangié a même lié les derniers événements sanglants au Liban à l’affaire du tribunal et n’a pas hésité à en attribuer la responsabilité à Damas. « Lorsque la Syrie a senti que la date de mise en place du tribunal approchait, elle a mis tout son poids dans la balance pour ébranler davantage la scène locale en poussant ses alliés à amplifier leur mouvement de protestation, dans l’espoir de faire chuter le gouvernement Siniora », a-t-il récemment déclaré sur le plateau d’une télévision locale. De la sorte, le vide institutionnel aurait été total et l’ONU n’aurait plus eu d’interlocuteur au Liban pour poursuivre le processus d’établissement du TSL, cette épée de Damoclès brandie au-dessus de Damas.
Si l’on considère ainsi que la Syrie est prête à tout pour empêcher la procédure judiciaire de se poursuivre, un éventuel accord politique ne sera qu’une trêve, voire un détail, dans le cadre de la crise qui secoue le Liban depuis plus de deux ans. La question reste toutefois de savoir si, sous la pression de l’opposition, Beyrouth peut encore intervenir au niveau des Nations unies concernant le processus de mise en place du TSL, dans la mesure où celui-ci a été enclenché sur base d’une résolution prise par le Conseil de sécurité, sur base du chapitre 7 de la Charte de l’ONU, lorsque la dispute locale autour du TSL a atteint son paroxysme.
En principe, la réponse est non. « Le processus de création du tribunal est irréversible », assure-t-on de sources concordantes judiciaires et politiques, alors que l’ONU se garde de donner un avis quelconque. « La question est hypothétique. Si le cas arrivait, on l’étudierait à ce moment-là. Il est difficile pour nous de dire à l’avance ce qui va se passer », a déclaré le porte-parole adjoint du secrétaire général, Yves Sorokoby, à notre correspondante à l’ONU, Sylviane Zehil.
Mais il est difficile de croire que l’opposition renoncera facilement à une bataille qu’elle mène pour ainsi dire par procuration. Contester la légitimité des décisions du gouvernement Siniora, rejetées d’ailleurs toutes officiellement par l’ancien président Émile Lahoud, reste une arme dont elle va se servir et que les avocats de la défense ne manqueront pas non plus d’employer, à l’ouverture du procès dans l’affaire Hariri, prévue techniquement dans moins d’un an, et réellement dans près de deux ans, à La Haye, aux Pays-Bas.
« Si l’opposition veut adopter une nouvelle décision concernant le tribunal, elle aura besoin des deux tiers des voix en Conseil des ministres, ce qu’elle n’a pas. Mais là où elle peut nuire, c’est au niveau du processus en retardant à l’infini certaines décisions », explique Samir Frangié à L’Orient-Le Jour, en donnant l’exemple d’une éventuelle nomination d’un juge, que l’opposition peut bloquer, ou encore de la contribution libanaise au financement du TSL, qui nécessite un vote au Parlement.
Pour M. Frangié, la bataille autour du tribunal est loin d’être finie, surtout que la Syrie, pointée du doigt dans l’attentat du 14 février 2005 par la majorité et par l’ancien chef de la commission internationale d’enquête, Detlev Mehlis, semble loin de baisser les bras dans sa lutte pour entraver le processus international, que ce soit par ses propres moyens ou à travers ses alliés locaux. Dans ce contexte, M. Frangié rappelle que la crise s’est exacerbée après l’assassinat du député Gebran Tuéni, avec la publication du rapport Mehlis, et n’exclut pas qu’une des motivations des pourparlers de paix syro-israéliens soit la volonté de Damas de gagner ainsi la sympathie de la communauté internationale, dans l’espoir d’atténuer la pression exercée sur elle par le biais du tribunal.

Un séminaire
de Friedrich Ebert
Dans les rangs de l’opposition, on estime cependant qu’il est prématuré de parler de la politique que celle-ci adoptera vis-à-vis des décisions du gouvernement Siniora et qu’en tout état de cause, celle-ci « réagira au cas par cas ». De source officielle au sein de l’opposition, on indique ainsi que le 8 Mars « ne formule pas d’objection sur le principe de création du tribunal international, mais conteste le procédé sur base duquel il a été créé ». Et de rappeler dans ce contexte la polémique qui avait éclaté entre le président de la Chambre, Nabih Berry, et le Premier ministre, Fouad Siniora, au sujet de l’inscription des deux projets de loi en rapport avec le TSL à l’ordre du jour du Conseil des ministres. « On verra plus tard si des décisions injustifiées ont été prises. Chaque chose en son temps », ajoute-t-on, laconique.
Un séminaire organisé autour de la question du tribunal à Berlin et La Haye par la Fondation Friedrich Ebert et le Centre international pour la justice transitionnelle (ICJT) fait la lumière sur de nombreuses questions judiciaires, techniques et politiques en rapport avec la mise en place du tribunal. Dans le contexte de turbulences politiques actuelles, l’accent devrait peut-être être essentiellement mis sur le principe de « l’imperméabilité » du tribunal à toutes les gesticulations politiciennes dont il est le centre ou la cible. Cette idée est ressortie à plusieurs reprises des interventions des participants au séminaire.
Ce qu’il faut retenir, c’est que la procédure internationale judiciaire dans l’affaire Hariri suit son cours normalement et sûrement. Le greffier nommé par l’ONU, Robert Vincent, prendra ses fonctions en juin pour commencer à établir les différentes structures inhérentes au TSL. Ce processus ne peut en aucun cas être affecté par l’évolution de la situation au Liban, aussi dramatique soit-elle, ou par les réserves des uns et des autres sur la procédure de mise en place et sur la légitimité du tribunal ou encore sur certains points de son statut. De toute façon, la défense ne manquera pas de relayer ces réserves, une fois le procès ouvert, dans le cadre des exceptions de forme qu’elle est appelée à présenter à la cour internationale.
Parallèlement, il semble que les magistrats internationaux et libanais nommés au TSL ont commencé à examiner les règles de procédure et de preuve, même s’il reste difficile de confirmer cette information, étant donné le secret qui entoure toujours, pour des raisons de sécurité, les noms et les activités des juges.

Un long démarrage
Normalement, le tribunal doit avoir été constitué en janvier 2009, mais le procès ne commencera pas avant la mi-2010, dans le meilleur des cas. Il faut comprendre que le TSL ne fonctionnera pas avant un an, à compter du moment de son établissement. Il faudra en outre compter deux mois pour le transfert des documents de la commission internationale d’enquête au tribunal, puis deux autres mois au moins pour les inculpations, qui ne seront pas publiques, en attendant que des suspects soient arrêtés et que des détenus soient transférés à La Haye.
Les accusés devront ensuite comparaître pour plaider coupables ou innocents, puis la défense présentera les exceptions de forme. Dans le meilleur des cas, il faudra compter un mois pour que la cour se prononce sur les exceptions de forme présentées. Si elle les rejette, les avocats de la défense pourront faire appel et il faudra de nouveau attendre le verdict de la cour d’appel qui a besoin, semble-t-il, d’un délai plus long que le tribunal. Passée l’étape des exceptions de forme, la défense réclamera un délai pour étudier le volumineux dossier constitué par la commission d’enquête.
Dans ce contexte, il est intéressant de signaler que le TSL est doté, contrairement aux autres tribunaux internationaux, d’un bureau de la défense, qui est, à l’instar du bureau du procureur, un organe inhérent au tribunal. « L’objectif est d’établir un équilibre entre la défense et le bureau du procureur », explique M. Luc Coté, magistrat canadien nommé procureur dans le tribunal pour la Sierre Leone. On sait que dans le cas du Liban, le procureur sera le président de la commission internationale d’enquête. « Il est important d’avoir une défense forte pour un procès juste et fort. Le fait que le bureau de la défense soit prévu dans le statut du tribunal, donnera à cette instance plus de force et de crédibilité et lui permettra de s’associer davantage à des décisions cruciales prises par le tribunal », explique-t-il, avant de balayer les craintes d’une politisation du procès. « Tous les tribunaux internationaux ont été créés pour des raisons politiques, mais c’est leur statut qui leur garantit toujours l’indépendance et l’impartialité nécessaire. C’est le cas pour le tribunal spécial pour le Liban. Sans compter que les juges internationaux choisis sont complètement étrangers à la vie politique du pays concerné. Leur jugement sera rendu sur base des preuves établies seulement. Il est évident que dans chaque tribunal, et non pas seulement dans celui qui a été créé pour le Liban, il y a des juges locaux avec peut-être des sympathies politiques déterminées, même si celles-ci ne sont pas officielles. Si lors de délibérations, ces sympathies peuvent transparaître, les juges locaux sont là pour remettre directement la discussion sur les rails », souligne M. Coté.
Il reste que si la politique est amenée à jouer un rôle quelconque, ce ne sera pas bien entendu au niveau de la procédure elle-même, mais parallèlement à celle-ci ou au niveau des contraintes inhérentes au statut du TSL. Si l’on prend ainsi l’exemple du tribunal spécial pour la Sierra Leone, il est intéressant de relever que si le président libérien, Charles Taylor, poursuivi par la justice internationale pour crimes de guerre et crimes contre l’humanité, commis entre 1991 et 2002, au Liberia et en Sierra Leone, avait pu être arrêté et traduit devant la juridiction internationale spéciale, c’est grâce à des tractations politiques qui avaient été menées à cette fin.
Dans le cas du Liban, l’une des difficultés auquelles le TSL sera confronté, c’est qu’il ne puisse pas aller haut dans la hiérarchie, à cause de la question de l’immunité qui ne figure pas dans le statut du tribunal. Affaire à suivre.

Tilda ABOU RIZK

Jumblatt: the Lebanese have the right to protest if we do not resolve the crisis



Head of the Democratic Gathering MP Walid Jumblatt responded to the Arab ministerial committee statement by stressing the positive efforts exerted to help Lebanon emerge from the current crisis.

Jumblatt added that the Lebanese have the right to demonstrate if the desired solutions are not achieved by the time the leaders return to Lebanon.

The MP noted that dialogue is the only way to solve the current crisis, and that a solution cannot be imposed by force and arms. He also pointed out that the issue of disarmament can only be discussed in a calm environment.

In an interview with Future News, Jumblatt commented that his bloc is not setting impossible conditions, adding the need to achieve balance between all parties. Jumblatt noted that what happened in Lebanon was a regional message, and hoped that this message will “not be used as a venue in Beirut,” and that the events of last week would not be repeated.

Once again the Druze leader, is trying his best to defend the Lebanese Democracy and its values against the project to make Lebanon an islamic country.

Monday, 19 May 2008

Lebanese agree on one out of three

The only point of agreement between Lebanese leaders has been the theoretical election of Sleiman as president. Qatar put forward compromise proposals calling for immediate presidential elections and the formation of a national-unity government while postponing discussion of a proposed new electoral law, but from Doha, the opposition refused to postpone discussion of a new electoral law.

إنه جبل كمال جنبلاط يا سيد المرتزقة...!




12 أيار, 2008

بقلم د.بهاء ابوكروم -قد تختلف الأوصاف والتشابيه بين مجرم وآخر أو بين مُدّعٍ وآخر إنما ما لايختلف عليه اثنان هو أن هالة السيد سقطت منذ نهار 8 آذار حين أخذ على عاتقه حماية نظام القتل السوري ومن ثم توالت في السقوط عندما أفلت عصاباته ومرتزقته في شوارع بيروت وعندما حاول دخول الجبل جبل كمال جنبلاط وسلطان الأطرش ووليد جنبلاط، ومع أن الحكمة هي من صفات رجال الدين عادةً فإنهاهذه المرة كانت ملكاً لوليد جنبلاط فقط وملكاً لأهل الجبل وكان الجهل مستحكماً في عقل السيد، سيد المرتزقة وسيد عصابات الغدر الذين هتكوا حرمات العزل واستقووا على المدنيين وعاثوا فساداً في الأرض بدل أن يحموا لبنان من الإسرائيلي تحولوا إلى إسرائيليين في الداخل وهم لا يقلون عنهم إجراماًوغدراً وخيانة.






لكن مع كل ذلك ومن دون مبالغة وبالأرقام أيضاً فإن ما تلقته ميليشيات حسن نصرالله في الجبل من خسائر لم يتلقاها يوماً في قتاله مع إسرائيل وأثبت أبناءالجبل في كل موقعة وفي كل قرية أنهم حقاً يستأهلون الاحترام والتبجيل وأنهم أبناء أوفياء لتراثهم ولعاداتهم وتقاليدهم العريقة وأنهم مقاتلون شجعان لا ترهبهم بطولات حزب الله ولا تخيفهم انتصاراته الوهمية حتى لواستعمل آلته الإعلامية بكل شائعاتها وأخبارها وتضليلها وحتى لو عمل باسمه وباسم حلفائه على خطف المواطنين على الطرقات وأخذهم من منازلهم فهذا كلهلم يخفِ حقيقة أن قتلاه ملئوا ساحات القتال في عيتات والشويفات وعين عنوب وديرقوبل وعرمون وتلة ال888 وعاليه وأنه عجز عن الدخول إلى المناطق التي قاتلته وأنه حين تجرأ على الدخول إلى جبال الشوف لم يعرف كيف يخرج منهابعد محاصرته مع آلياته من قبل الأهالي الذين كانوا ليبيدونهم لولا تدخل وليد جنبلاط وإصراره على إخراجهم بسلام.



نعم يا من ادعيتم أنكم مقاومة وكنتم بالأصل وبالوكالة مجرمون أو حماة المجرمين، لقد سقطت مقولاتكم وسقطت هالتكم وسقطت كل شرعيتكم وأظهرتم للملأ أنكم تتحملون مسؤولية كل الاغتيالات التي نالت من نواب لبنان ووزرائه وكتابه وصحافييه وأنتم تخافون المحكمة الدولية التي سوف تظهركم على حقيقتكم مجرمون ليس إلا، قتلة غدارين لا تستأهلون الاحترام حتى لو انتصرتم على العدو الإسرائيلي فكنتم إسرائيليين أكثر منهم لأن الناس ائتمنتكم على بيوتها وعلى حرماتها وكنتم كالوحوش الضالة تقصفوا بالصواريخ ما تعجزون عن الوصول إليه.



ومع أن المعركة لم تنته بعد فإن الحزب التقدمي الاشتراكي وأهالي الجبل الأبطال لن يقبلوا بأن تدخل إليهم عصابات حزب الله ولن يرحبوا إلا بالجيش اللبناني فمن يراهن على استسلام أو خضوع أو انهزام فهذا قد يكون حلماً من أحلامهليس إلا، إنما أهل الجبل لم يعرفوا يوماً الهزيمة وقد مرت عليهم أياما ًأصعب من هذه بكثير وكانوا صامدين واثقين من خطاهم مستلهمين من عزيمة المعلم كمال جنبلاط ومن عنفوانه قدرة على التحدي وإيقاع الهزيمة بكل من تجرأ عليهم.



نعم فمن لم يقرأ تاريخ هذا الجبل حتى الآن عليه أن يدرك بأن كمال جنبلاط زرع فينا ما لا يستطيع الولي الفقيه زرعه فيهم وأن شجاعة وليد جنبلاط وصبره وهوانه تفعل فينا ما تعجز عنتريات حسن نصر الله فعله فيهم وأن الجبل كان منتصراً ويبقى وأن وليد جنبلاط أقوى منهم ومن جبروتهم والأيام تثبت ذلك.



إنه جبل كمال جنبلاط يا سيد المرتزقة...

Saturday, 17 May 2008

Lebanon' "300"


While the West is busy living its daily life, a beast is busy killing the freedom of a small community on the East Mediterranean: Lebanon. Indeed, as of last week, the mighty Hezbollah, armed to the teeth with 30,000 rockets and missiles and aligning thousands of self described “Divine soldiers” has been marching across the capital, terrorizing its population, shutting down media, taking its politicians and the Prime Minister as hostages, and looting at will. The hordes of Lebanon’s “Khomeinist Janjaweeds” have conquered already half of the Middle East’s cultural capital, Beirut. As I have reported before, Hezbollah has occupied West Beirut and has since sent its storm troops in multiple directions to resume the blitz.

The burning of TV stations in Beirut
Unstoppable, including by the Lebanese Army which Commander Michel Sleiman has allowed the slaughter to occur the Pasdaran-founded militia is now hurdling towards the Druze Mountain and positioning its forces against the Sunni North and the Christian Mount Lebanon. Ironically, the geographical bases of Hezbollah, in southern Lebanon, are well guarded by the United Nations Interim Forces (UNIFIL). Per a UNSCR 1701 in 2006, more than 10,000 international troops are stationed across the southern parts of Lebanon, technically protecting the 200 Shia towns and villages from where the bulk of Hezbollah fighters came from. Hence, free from guarding their own areas, a dozen thousands well trained “Hezbollahis” have marched north to join another 5,000 already based in the southern suburbs of Beirut.
This huge force, by Lebanon’s standards, was joined by an undetermined number of real Iranian Guards, shipped from Tehran to man sophisticated weapons offered by the Khamanei regime as a gift to topple the democratically elected Government of Fuad Seniora. In addition, from the four corners of the country, Jihadist and ultra radical organizations have joined the fray including: The Nazi-like SSNP, the Amal Movement, the Wi’amWahhab pro-Syrian militia, and many others. And to top it, Damascus was able to neutralize the Lebanese Army which has been equipped recently by the United States. Its Commander, a candidate for the Presidency of the Republic was “convinced” by the Assad regime to open the passages to Beirut and all other regions for the hordes to thrust into their enemies’ backyards. Reminding us of the tales of Greek Antiquity, this Xerxes –Khomeinist- Army burst into the capital, whipping out the thin internal security forces and reigning with brutality.

Hezbollah’s “Immortal Guards” against the “300″?



After securing the Muslim side of the city, the “Immortal Guards” –since most of the Hezbollahis believe in martyrdom as a path to eternal after-life, encircled the mostly Druze Mountain from all directions. Closing in from the coast, the south and the Bekaa, thousands of fighters and their heavy artillery were ordered into battle this week end. The massive “Persian” Army is now attempting to take these passes into the Bekaa and from there into the North and the Christian Mountain. In a sense these may become Lebanon’s Thermopylae: A vast Hezbollah Iranian-backed Army unleashing its power against few Lebanese Spartans, to dislodge them and open the paths for the rest of the country. Indeed, it looks like the few hundred Druze fighters in Aley and the Shuf –who have decided to fight on their own, may become Lebanon’s “300”. The vision is chilling. Despite the calls by their leader Walid Jumblat, now hostage to the Pasdaran in Beirut, to desist from resisting, the mountainous peasants decided to fight and resist the onslaught. The balance of power is terribly uneven. The forces of Hassan Nasrallah, hyper armed by “Xerxes” Ahmedinijad, line up thousands of soldiers, Special Forces, missiles and endless containers of ammunition. They have hardened their battle experience through years of fighting against a powerful Israeli Army, Air Force and Navy. Nasrallah is convinced that his Army of Suicide-bombers has defeated the region’s nuclear super power in 2006. Hence, a few “hundreds” of Druses won’t even stand for a day. Logically, he is correct. The Lebanese Army was tamed by Hezbollah, the Sunnis of Beirut collapsed in few hours, the Christians are intimidated, the U.S and Europe fears Hezbollah’s Terror and the Arab regimes are terrified by his myth. Who on Earth will resist the Khomeinist Xerxes? Well so far, Lebanon’s 300 have.









The Grand Hezbollah PlanThe first waves of attacks launched by the Iranian backed forces aimed at seizing the first portion of the strategic Damascus Highway (the I-70 of Lebanon) linking Beirut to the Syrian border via the Mountain. The offensive began from Kayfoun towards Baysur. Instead of seizing terrain, Hezbollah lost Kayfoun with heavy casualties (about 23 killed) and the Druze fighters of the Socialist Party planted their flag on the enemy bunker before they pulled back to their positions. The Iranian commanders were stunned by these mountain “Rangers.” But the Druze had only AK 47 with one or two clips of ammunitions; rarely an RPG. While the whole of Lebanon was watching with fear, awaiting their turn, the “300” were repelling the waves of “Immortal Hezbollah” who in fact got very mortal in 24 hours. Another battle raged in Aley and the “Persians” lost again: 9 casualties or so: Among the bodies, three Iranians. Near Aley the strategic hill 888 was assaulted repetitively but the defenders repelled the “Guards.” Later on, the Druze transferred the hill to the Lebanese Army. Nasrallah’s troops then stormed Deir Qubal but were pushed back towards the surrounding hills. Hezbollah tried to seize Ein Unub but again the attack failed.

Druze clerics Hezbollah Guard

Then Hezbollah ordered its forces to advance on the coastal axis towards Shueifat. There, the Druze pulled back inside the town allowing the “Hezbos” to take the control of the beaches and the adjacent roads. But when the Iranian backed militias moved toward the neighborhoods, their advance was stopped. Frustrated the “Xerxes” War Room decided the grand assault by early Monday: More than 2,000 Khomeinist-trained commandos took the back roads to the Baruk Mountain coming from the southern Bekaa. Their target are the Maaser heights and from there to the district capital of the Shuf, Mukhtara. From south Lebanon, the hordes of Hezbollah are marching across Jezzine, Tumate heights into the southern frontiers of the Druze lands. According to reports, 5000 Hezbollah/Iranian/Syrian infantry, backed by rockets and artillery are to close in from the south. The Druze, youth and elderly, have mobilized all they could, but are isolated with little ammunition. Their adversaries are numerous, well equipped, fanaticized and have their supply lines opened to Syria and via Damascus, to Iran. The tableau looks like a real collection of small Thermopylae where the “300” of Lebanon will be fighting a Goliath.




Pasdaran and Hezbollah’s forces
But irony is that the United States and other Democracies, whose forces are present in the area and ships cruising the waters along the Eastern Mediterranean, and who have committed to fight terror around the globe may be watching these “300” falling in this epic fight. The greater irony is that these peasants of Mount Lebanon have withstood the mighty machine of Hezbollah for three days and maybe for a few more, while the standing myth internationally was that no one on Earth can defeat this Terror force. Well, for few days the myth of invincibility of Hezbollah was shattered. Eventually if the powers -who have already spent 500 billion dollars on the War on terror- would fail the Lebanese “300” in their mountains, the legend will be owned by the those little intrepid and courageous peasants. But if Washington and Paris would quickly assume their strategic responsibilities –which they initiated by voting UNSCR 1559 to liberate Lebanon- then perhaps Khomeinist-Terror won’t plant its banners on the Eastern Mediterranean.

******************

Dr Walid Phares is the Director of the Future Terrorism Project at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and the author of The Confrontation: Winning the War against Future Jihad.

Thursday, 15 May 2008

Testimonies from the Druze Mountain


“In their Own Words” – Accounts of young brave men who were defending their homes and families in Aley and the Shouf Mountains. May 12, 2008
Translated verbatim from Arabic to English

1 Melhim in Alley

My name is Melhim; I was with some of my friends driving around the southern eastern part of Alley. We noticed at a distance that Hezbollah has occupied several hills. We called using our cell phones and informed the people at the “markaz”. We also informed Wajdi. We stayed put. But within minutes, men, young and old, started arriving from all directions. Immediately the exchange of fire started. We saw at a distance at least 10 buses downloading Hezbollah fighters. I would put their number at a few hundred. The fighting became very intense. Our boys were advancing without any hesitation. I saw myself being driven at such a fast pace, I could not feel my legs. They looked like an army with their fancy equipment but we kept on pushing. Bullets were flying all over me. But for some weird reason, I had no fear of the bullets. They looked to me like heavy rain and I felt as if there is an invisible umbrella protecting me from the rain. I thought I was almost alone in my run towards the fire, but I looked around me and found at least three dozen boys at pace with me. I remembered looking at Wafic running on my right side with a smile on his face. “Melhim it is a good day to die, let us keep pressing he said”. We were firing our guns relentlessly and they were firing back but we were not dying. I could smell the fear of Hezbollah boys. At that point I realized that I have already spent 6 magazines and needed a break to reload. In the process I saw Druze fighters coming out of the woods in large numbers. What a beautiful sight, they looked like ghosts coming out from the trees firing with so much bravery. It started to turn into a massacre. Hezbollah fighters, despite their vast numbers, were falling like leaves. They were not able to pick their dead and wounded fast enough. Suddenly they started attacking us with Missiles and 155 cannons, from further points, to slow us down, and to allow their soldiers to retreat. The missiles mostly came from the town of Al-Qmatieh, A Hezbollah stronghold. That night Aley was hit by more than 500 missiles. They were afraid that we will overtake Al-Qmatieh. In reality, we could have taken Al-Qmatieh, but we got word that we are not to do so. Walid Beik said no. I looked at Wafic as we watched the poor Hezbollah boys run to where they came from and said” Wafic, I seems we didn’t die today, there is nothing we can do about it, we have to be patient (Badna ntawil balna). The funny thing was Wafic’s forearm was soaked with blood. He was hit with a bullet in the arm and had no clue. I would have loved to go down to Beirut and help the Mustaqbal boys. But there is only so few of us and we need to defend our villages first. What a cowardly attack. They attacked boys in the streets of Beirut who are neither armed nor experienced. Nothing can be more cowardly. When this is over we should train the Mustaqbal boys. If we can get missiles, and heavy artillery, between, the Druze, almustaqbal, and alqouwat, we will clean up the Dahiya in no time. We don’t need America or France we just need guns similar to what they have. Cowards. I just hate cowards. They boost standing up to Israel. Well this is different. This is not firing laser guided missiles at a tank 3 kilometers away. Nor is it shelling katyoushas and then rushing to hide in civilian neighborhoods under the kitchen sink.
2 Samir in Baisour
I am Samir from Baisour. We got word that Hezbollah has taken positions on the hills overlooking Baisour from Kaifoun’s side (Kaifoun is a Hezbollah town). Well we did not like it. We didn’t even understand why they were doing so. We have lived as brothers with our neighbors in Kaifoun for hundreds of years. Do they think that Baisour has a CIA or an Israeli post. We just didn’t understand it. Well the boys got very anxious especially the young ones. They could not wait; they wanted to start fighting now. I remember looking at Jamil the son of Mhana, who is barely 16. He was bouncing up and down, wearing his Brazil football shirt, holding a machine gun in one hand and a soccer ball in the other, wanting to rush and fight. As if there was a very important football game where Brazil is playing and he can not miss one second. Thanks to cell phones, when people got the word, they were pouring into the street with their guns. Some even came with hunting rifles. We tried to slow them down, but really we couldn’t; especially after Hezbollah starting firing at our village. What was most notable is that some elderly people from Kaifoun suddenly showed up and said. “We want you to know that we in Kaifoun are against what the Hizb is doing. We told them that we are family with the people of Baissour and we don’t want any problems. But they don’t listen to us. They come from other places with orders and there is nothing we can do about it”.
We were all moved with what this man had to say. We felt sorry for him. But we told him that we appreciate his gesture but Hezbollah need to leave.”

We got word that Hezbollah in Aley have lost more than 50 fighters and that they are shelling Alley with Missiles to slow our fighters down. We don’t have any missiles or any cannons. We gave it all to the Lebanese Army. All we have is machine guns and RPG’s. The attack started. Druze fighters from all over the mountain were pouring into Baisour. It was a beautiful sight, a majestic sight of fervor and bravery. They rushed to the battle front chanting and singing as if going to a wedding. It was so meditative, so rhythmic, so Druze.

And we poured on them like a bolt of lightning. They kept on bringing more and more enforcements but we will not stop. Suddenly they starting shelling us with missiles and 155 canon shells. They hit Ghazi Aridi’s house. Fortunately his wife and his kids were evacuated earlier. Our commanders starting coordinating with the Aley commanders and they have decided to take over the Hezbollah towns of Al-Qmatieh and Kaifoun. Before the offensive can start, it was ordered off. We were also asked to stop shooting and give them a chance to retreat. It is a miracle we have lost only two fighters and they have lost more than twenty. A miracle.

----------------------

3 Mama said no name, I am 16 from Aitat
My mother said I am not allowed to give you my name. Yes I was in the battle of Aitat. I am 16 years old. Well nothing much to it really. We are a small village, you know, and not a match for Hezbollah army. They can kill us all but not before we destroy most of their army. So we hit them as they approached the center of the village. We were firing at them from the woods above and from the north side. They were trapped and became lost. Trying to find an escape route but couldn’t. We kept firing until it was over. My mother doesn’t like me to mention how many we killed. She said it is nothing to be proud of. She says it is sad because these people also have mothers, sons and wives. I just wish they did not come to our village. This way no one would have died. That is all. As I said, there isn’t much to it really. I hope this war will stop soon so I can go back to school. I want to become an engineer and work in Dubai.
----------------------

4 Sami – Sleiman’s son; hold the onions mama
I am Sami the son of Sleiman. I heard my father say that Hezbollah has sneaked into the shouf from the backside. From Machghara in the Bakaa and places that I don’t know. The people in my village started talking and calling each other. They said that they entered from the barouk side and are close to Botmy and Neeha (Shouf villages). Men started organizing. My father said we need to prepare ourselves for battle. We are going to defend our mountain. My father took out the two klashins we have and started getting them ready. I was afraid that my father will go without me. So I grabbed one of the guns. My mother looked at my dad and he said to her. He is 17 he is a man now. My mother did not utter a single word. She just went to the kitchen and started preparing mjadara. Mjadara is my favorite dish. She wanted to make sure that I will have mjadara and basal as my zawady. But I knew I was not going to eat the basal because If I died, I did not want to die smelling of basal. I could see her cry as she was preparing our food. My father looked at her and said. “What happened to your beliefs (wane ymanik ya mara). No one will die one hour before his time. If it is our time, so be it. We will be back in the next life”. We took our guns our bullet magazines and off we went. The streets of the shouf were busy with men of all ages carrying guns and collecting themselves in groups and going to different fronts. I even saw women. Yes women with guns. Could you believe that. One of them was carrying an RPG. She had a nice military outfit. She must be from the hizb-al-ishtiraki. I wish I had an RPG.
We formed a caravan and we drove up to the hills. Different people were going to different fronts. I had no idea where we were going. We rode in Wajdi’s pick up and we joined eight other cars. It was dark already we could hear the bullets and the explosions. My father said ”you only do what I say”. We come from a religious house, we joined other people like us. My father is very brave, I have never felt any safer being close to him. After the cars were parked, we joined another group. The commanders, one of witch is my father, held a meeting and starting planning for our battle. I thought, they will have maps, but they didn’t. They were drawing the terrain maps and the ridges and the peaks on pieces of paper. The locals know every stone and every tree of their hills. They divided us into smaller groups. Each small group had a leader and each four leaders reported to a commander. There were about 60 of us. The shooting was getting louder. You could see the flashing of guns and the RPG rockets exploding all over the place. It seems there were several fronts. Hezbollah must have hundreds of men. Bullets were coming from all over the place. My father said we should outflank them. We split into two groups of about 30 each. My father took our group down into the valley (wady) and around the mountain. The plan is to have amou Abo Akram’s group engage them heavily so they will partially retreat for shelter around the mountain where our group will be waiting.
As we slowely and quietly moved, ( we were asked to leave behind any equipment that might make noise). After a while. My father chooses a spot above the ridge. He wanted all of us to remain as close to the ground as possible totally out of sight. He choose a spot for each one of us and gave each his own set of instructions. And said no one will move or open fire regardless how close they get until I say so. As we positioned ourselves firmly. We started getting flashlight signals from the other side of the ridge. It seems that the boys from an adjacent village had the same idea and positioned themselves on the other side of the ridge. My father responded with his flash light and the two were communicating. Don’t ask me how but it seems that they totally understood each other (I learnt later that this light communication method was inherited from the days of Amir Fakherdine, when they used to use fire to communicate with other fighters from one hill to the other. Nothing has changed except technology). My father then quickly changed our position so that we will not end up being in each other’s line of fire (meaning with the other group). We waited and waited and then started hearing heavy shooting and RPG explosions from Amou Abu Akram’s side. In less than five minutes we started spotting them from the other side. It seems the plan was working. We stayed put and waited until most of them were in our range. My heart was beating so fast, I thought it might explode. And yet my dad is not giving the signal. Few minutes later, he shouts “ YA ABOU IBRAHIM” and opens fire. Within a second both our groups were firing on them. It was a brilliant plan, just brilliant. We were hunting them like birds. Then we charged and so did the group from the other ridge. I felt like an eagle with wings nothing can stop me. We routed them completely. Then my father made us all stop. He wanted to give them a chance to simply retreat. We could have had at least ten more of them, but my father would not allow it. They are no longer a threat. We fight with honor. I wanted to go down and pick up one of the RGP’s they left behind. But my father said no. “Don’t worry Abu Akram’s team will collect their guns. It is time to pray and go home.”
It seems all the Shouf battles were victorious, we started hearing similar stories from other groups. They surrendered their positions to the Lebanese army and withdrew from the Chouf. I don’t know much about politics or about the leaders in Beirut. I was told that Walid beik did not want Hezbollah to be humiliated in the Chouf especially after the humiliation in Alley. So he ordered Hizb Al-ishtiraki to always give them a chance to withdraw and not entrap them. I don’t go to Beirut. I have no business in Beirut. We like the mountain. Our financial situation is very modest. I am still in school. But I help my father in taking care of the orchards especially during the olive picking season. I love to hunt and I love Lebanon and the Chouf mountain. They say Iran wants to come and take over Lebanon. But I say why do they want to do that. We are not hurting anyone. We have some land and few heads of lambs and we make and sell olive oil. We just mind our own business. We are not bothering anybody.

The Bravery of the Bani Mahrouf


Allah Yor7am kel el shohadaa bel Jabal bass just for the record:

Date : On the 11th of may 2008
Location : Dayer Kobeel
Place : House of Shaykh Allem Nassereddine
Time : 7 p.m

9 guys stopped the invasion of hizbollah in dayeer kobeel.

1-AL SHAYKH Allem nassereddine
2- AL SHAYKH Malek zeineddine
3- AL SHAYKH Wassim zeineddine
4- Ma3en abou fakhereddine
5- Kifah hatoum
6- Mersel kordab
7- Nasser Kordab
8- Nabil kordab
9- Haysam khaddej

For 4 hours they have stopped hizbollah invasion to the whole mountain
For 4 hours hizbollah army could not move one inch
For 4 hours they have fought 5 groups of hizbollha each group consisting of 12 soldiers with full equipment total number 60 soldiers.
For 4 hours they fought and killed more than 25
For 4 hours the invasion of the barbarians was stopped in dayer koobel by only 9 guys.

After hizbollah soldiers got mad from the 9 guys because they had lot of causalities they called the Lebanese army to ask the group to surrender their weapons to the Lebanese army.

While the 9 guys were giving their weapons to the army, Hezbollah shot Shaykh Allem Nassereddine ( Shaykh el shoukha ) in his head from the back. The remaining 8 continued fighting but they were shot from the back by anoher Hezbollah group.

Just for the record, the Lebanese army watched Hezbollah while they were shooting the guys.

Let the whole world know that Hezbollah did not only kill them but tortured them in a barbarian way.

Let the whole world know that Hezbollah could not fight 9 guys that were blessed by Bou Ibrahim.

Let the whole world know that more than 5 groups of Hezbollah could not even defeat 9 guys

Let the whole world know that all of us are Shaykh Allem nassereddine “shaykh el shyoukha”, Shaykh Malek zeineddine, Shaykh Wassim zeineddine, Ma3en abou fakhereddine, Kifah hatoum, Mersel kordab, Nasser Kordab, Nabil kordab, Haysam khaddej

What is killing me that I was not with them (Allah yor7am kel el shohadaa bel jabal)

Allah Kbeer

THe "300" Heros, which inflicted an auto destruction to hezbollah



The failure of Hezbollah’s latest effort to tilt the political and military balance in its favor was visible in the eyes of the mild inhabitants of the Shia village of Qomatiyeh on Tuesday, as they buried a young Hezbollah man killed by Druze fighters. According to the villagers, the young man, Suleiman Jaafar, was first wounded then executed by members of the Progressive Socialist Party. Such frightful ferocity will greet Hezbollah in every hostile location it would ever wish to control.

There is great poignancy in the fate of the people of Qomatiyeh. With Kayfoun, the village is one of two Shia enclaves in the predominantly Druze and Christian Aley district. The inhabitants, far more than their brethren in the southern suburbs or the South, must on a daily basis juggle between a past in which they coexisted with their non-Shia neighbors and a present and future in which the neighbors view them as an existential threat. That story written large may soon be the story of Lebanon’s Shia community after the mad coup attempt organized by Hezbollah last week. In the past decade and a half, Hezbollah has injected regional animosities and an antagonistic and totalistic ideology of confrontation into tens of thousands of Shia homes, quarters, towns and villages where such attitudes have no place. Whatever brings the Iranian concept of wilayat al-faqih – the guardianship of the jurisconsult – to Qomatiyeh? Suleiman Jaafar may have been a Hezbollah member, but he was more than anything else a village boy caught in a fight far bigger than him, than all of us.

A solution appears to have been found for the immediate crisis that began last week. The airport and roads have been opened, but there never was a way for Hezbollah to emerge successfully from the conflict it created. Militarily, the only way the party could have momentarily broken the deadlock in the mountains was to mount a massive invasion of Aley and the Chouf, using thousands of men and its most sophisticated weaponry. The Druze would have remained united – as Talal Arslan’s supporters and other Druze opposition members were united with Walid Jumblatt’s followers at the weekend. There would have been carnage, and had Hezbollah prevailed, it would have had to hold unfriendly territory indefinitely, locking down resources and manpower. Then what? An invasion of Metn? Kesrouan? Jbeil? The North? Not even the most ardent Hezbollah believer would have seriously argued that such a project was feasible. Military stalemate would have prevailed, and even if the stalemate had collapsed in one area, it would have been followed by myriad stalemates elsewhere, denying Hezbollah any real political gain.

But worse, Hezbollah’s actions of last week have brought terrible misfortune upon the Shia community. As the Christians learned to their detriment during the 1975-1990 war, fighting the Sunni community in Lebanon is tantamount to fighting the Arab world. The Northern Islamists have been awakened, and with them Sunni Islamists everywhere in the region and beyond who will rally to do battle against the apostate. As Saad Hariri said in his press conference on Wednesday, fitna, or discord between Muslims, already exists; things may still be under a measure of control, but not for long if the situation worsens. As Hariri implied, if Hezbollah chooses to break the Future Movement and the Sunni moderates, it will soon have to face the most extremist Sunnis.

The Shia community is obeying a leadership that cannot be said, in any way, to have ever understood the essence of the Lebanese system. Hezbollah and its secretary general, Hassan Nasrallah, will often insist that sectarian compromise requires handing the party, and Shia in general, veto power over political decision-making. But that’s not what the consociational system is about; the point of the sectarian arrangement is not to build a system based on mechanisms of obstruction. It is to force the different communities to reach compromises in order to avert mechanisms of obstruction. Hezbollah has repeatedly tried to ignore this by imposing its will in the street or through its guns. The result has been a gathering, strengthening alignment of adversaries that will fight hard before allowing Hezbollah or the Shia to gain hegemonic power.

But wasn’t this reaction always obvious? Apparently not to Nasrallah and his Iranian sponsors, who never had any liking for the baroque but necessary give and take of the Lebanese order – let alone respect for the retribution that has always crippled those ignoring its fundamental rules. Through its contempt for Lebanon, Hezbollah has left itself with two stark choices: either to integrate fully into the state or to control the state. But since it will or can do neither, we are in for a long and harsh standoff between Hezbollah and the rest of Lebanese society.

The clock began counting down in May 2000, when Israel withdrew from Lebanon. This threatened to deny the party its reason to exist, even though it tried to keep “resistance” alive through the Shebaa Farms front. In 2005, once the Syrians departed, everything collapsed. The party found itself having to justify its private army against a majority of Lebanese that opposed Hezbollah’s state within a state and its lasting allegiance to the Syrian regime. In 2006, as the national dialogue prepared to address the issue of Hezbollah’s weapons, Nasrallah sought to turn the tables by kidnapping Israeli soldiers and imposing his version of Hezbollah’s defense strategy on March 14. The plan backfired when Israel responded by ravaging Lebanon and the Shia in particular. And now, having fully discredited its “resistance” in the eyes of its countrymen, having ensured that an antagonistic population will be to its rear in the event of a new war with Israel, having weakened its non-Shia allies, Hezbollah, as both an idea and a driving force, is in its death throes. The party may yet endure, but the national resistance is finished.

It is undeniable that Hezbollah has over the years given Shia a heightened sense of self-respect. But regrettably, it has taken the party’s accumulation of arms to do so, even as Hezbollah has utterly failed to clarify the Shia role in any new Lebanon. In fact the party has consciously undercut that debate to retain its grip over its co-religionists and block the emergence of a sovereign country free of Syria. What kind of party places its own community in such dire straits? Certainly not one that can ever hope of finding itself at peace with its fellow Lebanese.

Michael Young is opinion editor of the Daily Star newspaper in Beirut.

The Lebanese "300" Heros


In Honour of the Brave Druze Men Who Sacrificed Their Lives for Our Land, Our Villages, Our Women, Our Children, Our Honour, Our Dignity, Our Future and Our Continued Existence!
In Honour of Our Shohadaa Who Shed Their Blood to Protect Our Name at All Costs and Against Overwhelming Odds!
In Honour of the Brave Druze HEROS Who Died to Teach Us The Meaning of Honour and Gave Us Pride in Our Druze Identity While We Stood Alone in The World During Three Days of Darkness.
We Will Always be in Your Debt My Brothers. Now and Always.

Dima2akon sanat 3ordana w2ardana, dafa3at 3en sharafna

May your souls rest in peace

Names of shohadaa:

1) Amin el Souki
2) Fadi el Souki
3) Shadi el Souki
4) Marwan el Jurdi
5) Shadi Arbid
6) AL SHAYKH Allem Nassereddine
7) AL SHAYKH Malek Zeineddine
8) AL SHAYKH Wassim Zeineddine
9) Wael el Bitar
10) Ma3en Abou Fakhereddine
11) Kifah Hatoum
12) Mersel Kordab
13) Nasser Kordab
14) Nabil Kordab
15) Haysam Khaddej

Contact Info Street: JEBAL EL DRUZEEEE

Recent News
Lebanon's '300' heroes
Published: Monday, 12 May, 2008 @ 8:02 PM in Beirut (GMT+2)
By Walid Phares
Beirut - While the West is busy living its daily life, a beast is busy killing the freedom of a small community on the East Mediterranean: Lebanon.


Indeed, as of last week, the mighty Hezbollah, armed to the teeth with 30,000 rockets and missiles and aligning thousands of self described "Divine soldiers" has been marching across the capital, terrorizing its population, shutting down media, taking its politicians and the Prime Minister as hostages, and looting at will. The hordes of Lebanon's "Khomeinist Janjaweeds" have conquered already half of the Middle East's cultural capital, Beirut. As I have reported before, Hezbollah has occupied West Beirut and has since sent its storm troops in multiple directions to resume the blitz.

The burning of TV stations in Beirut

Unstoppable, including by the Lebanese Army which Commander Michel Suleiman has allowed the slaughter to occur the Pasdaran-founded militia is now hurdling towards the Druze Mountain and positioning its forces against the Sunni North and the Christian Mount Lebanon. Ironically, the geographical bases of Hezbollah, in southern Lebanon, are well guarded by the United Nations Interim Forces (UNIFIL). Per a UNSCR 1701 in 2006, more than 10,000 international troops are stationed across the southern parts of Lebanon, technically protecting the 200 Shia towns and villages from where the bulk of Hezbollah fighters came from. Hence, free from guarding their own areas, a dozen thousands well trained "Hezbollahis" have marched north to join another 5,000 already based in the southern suburbs of Beirut.

This huge force, by Lebanon's standards, was joined by an undetermined number of real Iranian Guards, shipped from Tehran to man sophisticated weapons offered by the Khamanei regime as a gift to topple the democratically elected Government of Fuad Seniora. In addition, from the four corners of the country, Jihadist and ultra radical organizations have joined the fray including: The Nazi-like SSNP, the Amal Movement, the Wi'amWahhab pro-Syrian militia, and many others. And to top it, Damascus was able to neutralize the Lebanese Army which has been equipped recently by the United States. Its Commander, a candidate for the Presidency of the Republic was "convinced" by the Assad regime to open the passages to Beirut and all other regions for the hordes to thrust into their enemies' backyards. Reminding us of the tales of Greek Antiquity, this Xerxes -Khomeinist- Army burst into the capital, whipping out the thin internal security forces and reigning with brutality.

Hezbollah's "Immortal Guards" against the "300"?

After securing the Muslim side of the city, the "Immortal Guards" -since most of the Hezbollahis believe in martyrdom as a path to eternal after-life, encircled the mostly Druze Mountain from all directions. Closing in from the coast, the south and the Bekaa, thousands of fighters and their heavy artillery were ordered into battle this week end. The massive "Persian" Army is now attempting to take these passes into the Bekaa and from there into the North and the Christian Mountain. In a sense these may become Lebanon's Thermopylae: A vast Hezbollah Iranian-backed Army unleashing its power against few Lebanese Spartans, to dislodge them and open the paths for the rest of the country. Indeed, it looks like the few hundred Druze fighters in Aley and the Shuf -who have decided to fight on their own, may become Lebanon's "300". The vision is chilling. Despite the calls by their leader Walid Jumblatt, now hostage to the Pasdaran in Beirut, to desist from resisting, the mountainous peasants decided to fight and resist the onslaught. The balance of power is terribly uneven. The forces of Hassan Nasrallah, hyper armed by "Xerxes" Ahmedinijad, line up thousands of soldiers, Special Forces, missiles and endless containers of ammunition. They have hardened their battle experience through years of fighting against a powerful Israeli Army, Air Force and Navy. Nasrallah is convinced that his Army of Suicide-bombers has defeated the region's nuclear super power in 2006. Hence, a few "hundreds" of Druses won't even stand for a day. Logically, he is correct. The Lebanese Army was tamed by Hezbollah, the Sunnis of Beirut collapsed in few hours, the Christians are intimidated, the U.S and Europe fears Hezbollah's Terror and the Arab regimes are terrified by his myth. Who on Earth will resist the Khomeinist Xerxes? Well so far, Lebanon's 300 have.

The Grand Hezbollah Plan

The first waves of attacks launched by the Iranian backed forces aimed at seizing the first portion of the strategic Damascus Highway (the I-70 of Lebanon) linking Beirut to the Syrian border via the Mountain. The offensive began from Kayfoun towards Baysur. Instead of seizing terrain, Hezbollah lost Kayfoun with heavy casualties (about 23 killed) and the Druze fighters of the Socialist Party planted their flag on the enemy bunker before they pulled back to their positions. The Iranian commanders were stunned by these mountain "Rangers." But the Druze had only AK 47 with one or two clips of ammunitions; rarely an RPG. While the whole of Lebanon was watching with fear, awaiting their turn, the "300" were repelling the waves of "Immortal Hezbollah" who in fact got very mortal in 24 hours. Another battle raged in Aley and the "Persians" lost again: 9 casualties or so: Among the bodies, three Iranians. Near Aley the strategic hill 888 was assaulted repetitively but the defenders repelled the "Guards." Later on, the Druze transferred the hill to the Lebanese Army. Nasrallah's troops then stormed Deir Qubal but were pushed back towards the surrounding hills. Hezbollah tried to seize Ein Unub but again the attack failed.

Druze clerics Hezbollah Guard

Then Hezbollah ordered its forces to advance on the coastal axis towards Shouifat. There, the Druze pulled back inside the town allowing the "Hezbos" to take the control of the beaches and the adjacent roads. But when the Iranian backed militias moved toward the neighborhoods, their advance was stopped. Frustrated the "Xerxes" War Room decided the grand assault by early Monday: More than 2,000 Khomeinist-trained commandos took the back roads to the Barouk Mountain coming from the southern Bekaa. Their target are the Ma'aser heights and from there to the district capital of the Shouf, Mukhtara. From south Lebanon, the hordes of Hezbollah are marching across Jezzine, Toumate heights in Niha el Shouf into the southern frontiers of the Druze lands. According to reports, 5000 Hezbollah/Iranian/Syrian infantry, backed by rockets and artillery are to close in from the south. The Druze, youth and elderly, have mobilized all they could, but are isolated with little ammunition. Their adversaries are numerous, well equipped, fanaticized and have their supply lines opened to Syria and via Damascus, to Iran. The tableau looks like a real collection of small Thermopylae where the "300" of Lebanon will be fighting a Goliath.

Pasdaran and Hezbollah's forces

But irony is that the United States and other Democracies, whose forces are present in the area and ships cruising the waters along the Eastern Mediterranean, and who have committed to fight terror around the globe may be watching these "300" falling in this epic fight. The greater irony is that these peasants of Mount Lebanon have withstood the mighty machine of Hezbollah for three days and maybe for a few more, while the standing myth internationally was that no one on Earth can defeat this Terror force. Well, for few days the myth of invincibility of Hezbollah was shattered. Eventually if the powers -who have already spent 500 billion dollars on the War on terror- would fail the Lebanese "300" in their mountains, the legend will be owned by the those little intrepid and courageous peasants. But if Washington and Paris would quickly assume their strategic responsibilities -which they initiated by voting UNSCR 1559 to liberate Lebanon- then perhaps Khomeinist-Terror won't plant its banners on the Eastern Mediterranean.

Dr Walid Phares is the Director of the Future Terrorism Project at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and the author of The Confrontation: Winning the War against Future Jihad.